Storage News
Security News
Networking News 
FREE NEWSLETTERS
search
Home Storage Networking Security Resources Forum Links

Go Back   Enterprise IT Planet Forum > Networking

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2010, 04:33 PM
it_sav it_sav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Fundamental Networking Confusion

I've been searching for the answer to this question for some time, but apparently am not phrasing it well. I hope someone here can help me.

This feels like a really fundamental misunderstanding on my part, but I can't seem to wrap my head around it.

I've got a couple scenarios below all dealing with bandwidth with varying rates across legs of the journey.

Scenarios:
1. 2 - 10/100 switches with a gigabit uplink to each other. Host A and B are on Switch A, and Host C and D are on Switch B. If A is sending or receiving data from Host C at 100Mb/s and Host B is sending or receiving data from Host D at 100 Mb/s, will the fact that there is a gigibit uplink matter at all?

2. Host A has a gigabit NIC and is plugged into a gigabit port on a switch. Hosts B and C are both 100 Mb/s. If both B and C are transferring large files to or from Host A at the same time, will the fact that Host A has a gigabit NIC matter at all?

3. Network A has a 10 Mb/s WAN link. Remote Networks B and C both have 1.5 Mb/s WAN links. If both B and C are transferring large files to or from Network A at the same time, will the fact that Host A has a larger WAN link matter at all?

Any thoughts, further resources, or links would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2010, 11:41 AM
ua549 ua549 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 346
1. Yes, both switches can process more traffic faster from a number of sources.

2. Yes, once again the faster link allows more traffic into the switch where it is distributed to any number of slower links.

3. Yes.

What you are not understanding is the fact that more than one of the slow links from a switch to end node can be "active" at any given moment in time. That is the big advantage of a switch over a hub.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2010, 02:40 PM
it_sav it_sav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Thank you very much for your reply. I'd like to rephrase and see if i'm getting this.

So in scenario 1, physically switch A receives the data from both hosts A and B at the slower speed, forwards the data to switch B at the faster speed. Then switch B holds the data in a buffer while it meters the data out to hosts C and D at the slower speed again. Is that right?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2010, 12:08 PM
ua549 ua549 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 346
Yes, that is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2010, 12:26 PM
it_sav it_sav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Got it, thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04 AM.




Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width



Acceptable Use Policy

Internet.com
The Network for Technology Professionals

Search:

About Internet.com

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.